Miller Electric

Welding Discussion Forums

Home » Resources » Communities » Welding Discussion Forums
 
Miller Welding Discussion Forums - Powered by vBulletin

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Southern NH
    Posts
    233

    Default approx strength of wood vs. aluminum

    Hi all,
    I have a project where I want to replace some plywood with some aluminum plate. I want to retain roughly the same strength, but it is not life & limb critical.

    The plywood to be replaced is actually 5/8" thick OSB (oriented strand board, a.k.a. "waferboard"). I want to use 6061-T6 aluminum plate to replace it, and I am wondering what thickness of aluminum plate would give me roughly the same strength as the original 5/8" OSB. My initial guess was to try half the thickness, which would be 5/16" 6061-T6 plate, but honestly I have no idea. I'd rather not waste unnecessary money if 3/16" or 1/4" would do the trick. I'm guessing 1/8" would be noticeably weaker than the 5/8" OSB.

    Does anyone have some advice, or an online resource that gives approximate equivalences of strength between OSB and aluminum?

    Thanks in advance for any help you can offer.
    -Eric
    miller dynasty 350
    miller spectrum 1000

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    135

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ridesideways View Post
    Hi all,
    I have a project where I want to replace some plywood with some aluminum plate. I want to retain roughly the same strength, but it is not life & limb critical.

    Thanks in advance for any help you can offer.
    -Eric
    Need a few more details . . . photos or dimensions. If you have room to add a few ribs, you can make a structure with 1/8 inch plate.

    Jim

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    864

    Default

    I'm assuming that when you are talking about having the same "strength" you really mean you want the same "stiffness."

    Stiffness is the product of the material modulus of elasticity and the section moment of inertia, or "EI." It determines deflection (sponginess), which is generally the controlling criteria anyway.

    For a rectangular cross section, the moment of inertia is (bh^3)/12, where b is width and h is depth.

    The modulus of elasticity of some materials is as follows:

    Steel: 30,000 ksi
    Aluminum: 10,000 ksi
    OSB: 1,000 ksi

    So the stiffness for a 12" wide strip of 5/8 nominal OSB (actual thickness 19/32") is:

    12*(.594^3)/12*1,000,000=209,300lb*in^2

    Now to get the same stiffness from aluminum, find X...

    12*(x^3)/12*10,000,000=209,300

    x=.276"

    So to match 5/8 OSB, you need .276" thick aluminum. If you use 1/4", you'll get:

    12*(.25^3)/12*10,000,000=156,200 lb in^2 which is only 75% as stiff as the OSB.

    Go with 5/16" aluminum and you'll get:

    12*(.25^3)/12*10,000,000=305,200 lb*in^2 which is 146% as stiff as the OSB.

    Note that the extra 1/16" thickness doubled the stiffness. Also note that any grade of aluminum will be about this stiff. T6 does not make it stiffer.

    Is this the answer you were looking for?

    80% of failures are from 20% of causes
    Never compromise your principles today in the name of furthering them in the future.
    "All I ever wanted was an honest week's pay for an honest day's work." -Sgt. Bilko
    "We are generally better persuaded by reasons we discover ourselves than by those given to us by others." -Pascal
    "Since we cannot know all that there is to be known about anything, we ought to know a little about everything." -Pascal

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    180

    Default

    I hope a few high school math teachers saw this thread. It make a great argument for why math matters to people in everyday life. Great work Bodybagger!
    Miller XMT-350 CC/CV
    Miller S-22A wirefeeder
    Bernard 400A "Q" gun
    Miller 30-A Spoolmatic w/WC-24
    CK 210 & WP-18 GTAW torches
    Hypertherm Powermax 30
    O/A Rig, Enco 4x6 bandsaw, etc.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lake of the Ozarks MO
    Posts
    3,559

    Default

    And after you price that, then the wood will seem like a super bargain

    www.facebook.com/outbackaluminumwelding
    Miller Dynasty 700...OH YEA BABY!!
    MM 350P...PULSE SPRAYIN' MONSTER
    Miller Dynasty 200 DX "Blue Lightning"

    Miller Bobcat 225 NT (what I began my present Biz with!)
    Miller 30-A Spoolgun
    Miller WC-115-A
    Miller Spectrum 300
    Miller 225 Thunderbolt (my first machine bought new 1980)
    SPEEDGLAS 9100XX

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Southern NH
    Posts
    233

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodybagger View Post
    I'm assuming that when you are talking about having the same "strength" you really mean you want the same "stiffness."

    Is this the answer you were looking for?
    Wow that is exactly what I was looking for! Thank you so much!

    Yes, when I say "same strength," I really mean same stiffness. Stiffness is what I care about here-- I really don't anticipate the thing actually *breaking* or anything.

    Incidentally, it is a platform on which my two race motorcycles sit. The platform deck is about 8' x 10'.

    The whole thing is currently made of 6061-T6 aluminum structural members, except for the deck, which is the 5/8" OSB, and therefore not very weather resistant. The structural supports are AL channel spaced every 16". 5/16" Al plate is obviously pricey, so it might make sense to weld in more supports, so that I can go with something thinner for the deck.

    It looks like some more calculations are in order on my part. Obviously the goal is figure out the least costly solution: more joists & thinner plate, or fewer joists and thicker plate. I think given BB's formulas, it should be straightforward to calculate.

    I am still a little confused as to why the 6061-T6 "grade" of aluminum has no impact on the stiffness. For example, if I take some 1/16" sheet of 6061-T6, and run my acetylene torch over it to anneal it, the AL sheet becomes noticeably easier to bend. Is my thinking wrong here?
    miller dynasty 350
    miller spectrum 1000

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    864

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ridesideways View Post
    I am still a little confused as to why the 6061-T6 "grade" of aluminum has no impact on the stiffness. For example, if I take some 1/16" sheet of 6061-T6, and run my acetylene torch over it to anneal it, the AL sheet becomes noticeably easier to bend. Is my thinking wrong here?
    The following applies to 6061-T6 and 6061-T0 at room temperature
    .
    When you bend it, you are exceeding the yield point. Below the yield point, a material will exhibit elastic behavior and return to its original shape after being deformed... like a spring

    The heat treatment changes the yield point. At T6, the yield point is around 40,000psi. Annealed (T0), the yield point is around 8,000 psi.

    So, the modulus of elasticity (along with the section moment of inertia) determines how stiff the member is in the elastic range.

    Yield point determines when the material "gives way" and deforms.

    Heat treat only changes the yield point - not the modulus of elasticity. Both grades will exhibit the same stiffness right up to the point where they give way... and the T0 will get to that point WAY before the T6 does.

    The following applies to almost every metal when heated...

    When a metal is heated, its modulus of elasticity goes down. It becomes less stiff.

    When you heat your 6061-T6 with a torch to bend it, you are doing BOTH... you are removing the temper (lowering the yield point) AND lowering the modulus of elasticity. When it cools to room temperature, the modulus of elasticity will return to 10,000,000 psi. The yield point may only return to 8,000 psi. But the stiffness depends only on the modulus of elasticity and the section moment of inertia (EI), NOT the ultimate strength or the yield point.

    Does this explain, or was it too complicated?

    80% of failures are from 20% of causes
    Never compromise your principles today in the name of furthering them in the future.
    "All I ever wanted was an honest week's pay for an honest day's work." -Sgt. Bilko
    "We are generally better persuaded by reasons we discover ourselves than by those given to us by others." -Pascal
    "Since we cannot know all that there is to be known about anything, we ought to know a little about everything." -Pascal

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lake of the Ozarks MO
    Posts
    3,559

    Default

    Complicated as it may sound... you still explained it in terms that could be understood.
    Thanks on my part

    www.facebook.com/outbackaluminumwelding
    Miller Dynasty 700...OH YEA BABY!!
    MM 350P...PULSE SPRAYIN' MONSTER
    Miller Dynasty 200 DX "Blue Lightning"

    Miller Bobcat 225 NT (what I began my present Biz with!)
    Miller 30-A Spoolgun
    Miller WC-115-A
    Miller Spectrum 300
    Miller 225 Thunderbolt (my first machine bought new 1980)
    SPEEDGLAS 9100XX

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    864

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ridesideways View Post
    The structural supports are AL channel spaced every 16". 5/16" Al plate is obviously pricey, so it might make sense to weld in more supports, so that I can go with something thinner for the deck.

    It looks like some more calculations are in order on my part. Obviously the goal is figure out the least costly solution: more joists & thinner plate, or fewer joists and thicker plate. I think given BB's formulas, it should be straightforward to calculate.
    Well, not exactly very straightforward...

    OK, you are spanning 16" joists. To simplify things, we will analyze a 16" long simply supported 12" wide sheet of 3/16" aluminum.

    E=10,000,000 psi
    I=(12*(3/16)^3)/12=.00659 in^4
    Live load=100psf->8.33lb/in
    Dead load=2.7psf->.225lb/in
    Ultimate bending moment=((1.6LL+1.2DL)*span^2)/8=[{1.6(8.33)+1.2(.225)*16^2]/8=435 in*lb
    Ultimate shear= (1.6LL+1.2DL)*span/2=[{1.6(8.33)+1.2(.225)*16]/2=109lb
    Max deflection=(5*(LL+DL)*span^4)/(384*E*I)=(5*(8.33+.225)*16^4)/(384*10,000,000*.00659)=0.108" which is L/148 (which exceeds the L/360 you'd use for floors)
    Ultimate stress in bending = 6Mu/(bh^2)= 6*435/(12*(3/16)^2)=6,191psi
    Ultimate stress in shear = Vu/bh=109/(12*(3/16))=48.3psi

    As you can see, all the stresses are easily well below the 40,000psi yield point of 6061-T6. However, the deflection is already higher than ideal. Reasonable, but still more than you'd like.

    You see, deflection almost always controls. I'd probably use 3/16 in one or two large sheets and rivet it to the joists pretty regularly.

    Simple huh? BTW, you'd repeat the calculations for every thickness you want to try. This is the simple version that does not take into account the effects of spanning multiple joists.

    80% of failures are from 20% of causes
    Never compromise your principles today in the name of furthering them in the future.
    "All I ever wanted was an honest week's pay for an honest day's work." -Sgt. Bilko
    "We are generally better persuaded by reasons we discover ourselves than by those given to us by others." -Pascal
    "Since we cannot know all that there is to be known about anything, we ought to know a little about everything." -Pascal

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    135

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodybagger View Post
    Well, not exactly very straightforward...

    OK, you are spanning 16" joists. To simplify things, we will analyze a 16" long simply supported 12" wide sheet of 3/16" aluminum.

    E=10,000,000 psi
    I=(12*(3/16)^3)/12=.00659 in^4
    Live load=100psf->8.33lb/in
    Dead load=2.7psf->.225lb/in
    Ultimate bending moment=((1.6LL+1.2DL)*span^2)/8=[{1.6(8.33)+1.2(.225)*16^2]/8=435 in*lb
    Ultimate shear= (1.6LL+1.2DL)*span/2=[{1.6(8.33)+1.2(.225)*16]/2=109lb
    Max deflection=(5*(LL+DL)*span^4)/(384*E*I)=(5*(8.33+.225)*16^4)/(384*10,000,000*.00659)=0.108" which is L/148 (which exceeds the L/360 you'd use for floors)
    Okay, I understand the calculations, but where did come up with the Live load, Dead load . . . and the factors 1.6 and 1.2?

    Jim

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Warning: Non-static method PhpQuickProfiler::getMicroTime() should not be called statically in /mnt/stor3-wc1-dfw1/357822/357839/www.millerwelds.com/web/content/lib/pqp/classes/Console.php on line 77

Warning: Non-static method PhpQuickProfiler::getMicroTime() should not be called statically in /mnt/stor3-wc1-dfw1/357822/357839/www.millerwelds.com/web/content/lib/pqp/classes/Console.php on line 77

Warning: Non-static method PhpQuickProfiler::getMicroTime() should not be called statically in /mnt/stor3-wc1-dfw1/357822/357839/www.millerwelds.com/web/content/lib/pqp/classes/Console.php on line 77

Warning: Non-static method PhpQuickProfiler::getMicroTime() should not be called statically in /mnt/stor3-wc1-dfw1/357822/357839/www.millerwelds.com/web/content/lib/pqp/classes/Console.php on line 77

Warning: Non-static method PhpQuickProfiler::getMicroTime() should not be called statically in /mnt/stor3-wc1-dfw1/357822/357839/www.millerwelds.com/web/content/lib/pqp/classes/Console.php on line 77

Warning: Non-static method PhpQuickProfiler::getMicroTime() should not be called statically in /mnt/stor3-wc1-dfw1/357822/357839/www.millerwelds.com/web/content/lib/pqp/classes/Console.php on line 77

Warning: Non-static method PhpQuickProfiler::getMicroTime() should not be called statically in /mnt/stor3-wc1-dfw1/357822/357839/www.millerwelds.com/web/content/lib/pqp/classes/Console.php on line 77

Warning: Function split() is deprecated in /mnt/stor3-wc1-dfw1/357822/357839/www.millerwelds.com/web/content/lib/footer.inc.php on line 82

Welding Projects

Special Offers: See the latest Miller deals and promotions.