Results 11 to 18 of 18
Thread: Aluminum motor mounts
-
08-27-2008, 07:15 AM #11
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 4
Last edited by Nthe11s; 08-27-2008 at 07:16 AM. Reason: added info
-
08-27-2008, 10:38 AM #12
Trstek, I'm not sure what alloy they use, but you're right - the whole rear suspension and sub frame on my e39 is aluminum, as are the front suspension arms.
What I was getting at in the other post was that the thickness of the plate was getting excessive and that it still didn't provide the rigidity to counter the flexes the engine will induce on it. Boxing the section would eliminate the issue.Syncrowave 250DX
Invison 354MP
XR Control and 30A
Airco MED20 feeder
Thermal Dynamics Cutmaster 81
Smith O/A rig
And more machinery than you can shake a 7018 rod at
-
09-03-2008, 03:36 PM #13
Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Belle Plaine Iowa
- Posts
- 233
First Ill say Im not familiar with the 4.6 or the body youre using.
If youre going to use solid mounts forget making your own like that and use motor plates. These are simply flat plates bolted to the front of the block and bell housing. They are ultra simple and you can usually get a universal design which you can trim for your specific application. You will have to add shim material between the flywheel and converter to insure proper engagment to the pump.
Should you doubt the integrity of the simple design keep in mind that is what is used on those 6000 horsepower fire breathing nitro cars. My digger uses the same thing even tho its only an 8 second car. Working on the car is faster as the engine can stay put as you pull the trans and vice versa. Having the mounts in the middle of the block will require supporting one end of the parts that stay in the car. Installation and removal will go much smoother as you wont be reaching into a dark hole trying to get a bolt started.
-
09-16-2008, 08:32 PM #14
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 612
I agree with the motor plate/mid plate idea.
IMHO I wouldn't use shims on the converter though. I'd have the correct extended mounting pads welded on the converter by the manufacturer.
-
09-24-2008, 02:53 PM #15
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Posts
- 2,019
slightly off topic ... V8 E30??
Fishy Jim
had you done a (bmw) v8 conversion in your e30?
thanks
Heiti
-
09-24-2008, 05:58 PM #16
I"ve made some aluminum mounts on a few cars in the past (mainly hi-po 4 and 6 cyl apps) And one thing that tends to be prevelant in all of them is the "ovaling" of the main bolt hole on your standard type of mounts where the main bolt joins the 2 pieces together.
If possible use either steel or some 7075 inserted as a "sleeve" for the main bolt to keep it from ovaling and make sure it runs the full length of the bolt. Basically you would be using the steel/7075 in place of where teh rubber isolater is with it's sleeve for the main bolt to help the mount last longer.
I would agree with most others about staying away from AL for motor mounts, Personally i would use some stainless on them unless you area dead set on AL. 6061 and 3105 are going to be your only heat treatable and weldable alloys if you do go with AL
An engine plate of 6061 + 2 mounts towards teh rear would probably be the optimal setup IMO.Dynasty 200DX
Hobart Handler 135
Smith MB55A-510 O/A setup
Lathe/Mill/Bandsaw
Hypertherm Powermax 45
Just about every other hand tool you can imagine
-
09-24-2008, 08:43 PM #17
Nope, just did the conforti chip, a few things to the intake and exhaust, pretty much replaced the whole suspension with racing stuff (including lower rear end gears), and shaved a lot of excess weight. SCCA wouldn't let me run in anything but modified class.
So I just drove the heck out of it on the street. 
I'm not sure what I would think of the 4.4L in that small of a car. It's pretty potent in the 4000# 540. I'd love to get my hands on a M5 version of my car, I don't really care for the new ones styling. Right now I just have eibach anti-sway's and 40 series 18" rubber. I'm torn between replacing the shocks and springs and just cutting a coil or two off the stock springs. I like the ride quality, but I'd like it to be a little lower and not so squishy in corners.Syncrowave 250DX
Invison 354MP
XR Control and 30A
Airco MED20 feeder
Thermal Dynamics Cutmaster 81
Smith O/A rig
And more machinery than you can shake a 7018 rod at
-
10-04-2008, 02:02 AM #18
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- flat , and lots of dirt
- Posts
- 123
Smooth delivery or violent delivery, I still wouldnt use aluminum. The last Pontiac 455 I built had a habit of destroying mounts. we solved that by bolting a chain to the front of the cyl head, and leaving about 1/2 " of slack in it. My point is this though, I saw the aluminum mounts on a few "fast" cars and if there is one place that I would spend a few extra pounds it is on the mounts. I agree that the 7075 machined mounts would be tough, but have you priced a chunk of that lately? You could make 10 sets of mounts in half the time out of stainless for 1/3 the price. And you cannot just reheat the 6061 to get the strength back, it is a delicate controlled process, that involves pre-heating and time @ precise temperature.
Last edited by Blackbird455; 10-04-2008 at 02:12 AM.
SYNCROWAVE 200
Atlas 618 lathe (vintage 1960) reconditioned DC
Sioux 3/8 Pneumatic Reversible Drill
Makita Everything else
2400 square feet of Sanford and Son lookin shop space
"Once the spoon flys, putting the pin back in won't solve anything"
USA 15T, 15V
www.myspace.com/blackbird455
http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m...5/DSC00356.jpg two cans, one welder



Reply With Quote








